![]() ![]() Furthermore, Star Wars weaponry have been described as Plasma in the past (called "ionised gas" in The Force Awakens ICS) and kinetic barriers can shield itself against Plasma, since Plasma does have mass, although I do acknowledge that determining the nature of Star Wars weaponry is still a point of contention. ![]() On the other hand Reaper Capital ships have been shown to be incredibly durable, withstanding a fleet's worth of firepower as shown in Mass Effect 1 against The Cotadel Fleet and the System Alliance's fleets. not so impressive, however Star Wars Rebels also shows us how accurate turbolasers can be when targeting stationary targets, being able to hit a small shield generated by the Rebels with a decent amount of accuracy despite being thousands of kilometres above the planet's surface. On the other side of the coin you could take firepower from Star Wars Rebels and the films where firepower is. What calcs are we using for the Imperial Star Destroyer? You could argue that, due to the number of gun emplacements on the Star Destroyer, along with their insane rate of fire, having double digit kiloton yield guns or greater would give the Star Destroyer a distinct advantage in terms of firepower as it would be able to dish out megatons worth of firepower in a handful of seconds. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |